لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative from the regulation laid down through the Supreme Court inside the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Thus, the competent authority in the parent department from the petitioner and the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount from the petitioner and pay back the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to your petitioner to which he is entitled under the law within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority on the respondent can also be directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits from the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
4. Record shows that the petitioner has become booked in as much as eight criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the instant case. Regardless that the petitioner has obtained bail in Those people cases, it does, prima facie, establish that the petitioner is prone to repeating the offence.
competent authority and if any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
lengthy period petitioner was not thought of for promotion, meeting in the departmental promotion committee and look at the petitioner (Promotion)
The case addresses a range of issues such as, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation in the right to life.
Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there may be 1 or more judgments presented (or reported). Only the reason for that decision of your majority can represent a binding precedent, but all may be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning might be adopted in an argument.
forty eight . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice of the Peace u/s 22-A is not obliged to afford a possibility of hearing on the accused party; nor obliged to always or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to consider all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal regulation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a few of the relevant factors. Read more
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe as being a foster child. Even though the pair had two young children of their own at home, the social worker didn't notify them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report on the court the following day, the worker reported the boy’s placement from the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the pair had young children.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability from the matter, but could not be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request towards the appellate court.
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, will more info be the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It consists of the execution of your convicted person as being a consequence of their crime.
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury into a person, by executing an act which during the ordinary course of nature is probably going to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently dangerous that it must in all probability cause death, causes the death of the these types of person, is alleged to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
A lessen court may well not rule against a binding precedent, although it feels that it is unjust; it might only express the hope that a higher court or even the legislature will reform the rule in question. In the event the court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and wishes to evade it and help the law evolve, it might both hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts with the cases; some jurisdictions allow for any judge to recommend that an appeal be performed.
competent authority has determined the eligibility from the private respondents and found them to get in good shape for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)